Ballmer answers why no RIM acquisition?
2011 has an interesting twist separating it from years past: RIM, despite yet belongings on, clearly is wandering aimlessly in the consumer smartphone market place. Their OS is erstwhile, not very appealing and despite numerous attempts, they've failed to really 'wow' anyone recently. They sort of reflect Microsoft with Windows Mobile 6.x.
Still, they have killer attain in enterprise and a solid, virtually world standard for email distribution. Considering Microsoft is sitting on $40B in reserves, why non make a bid for RIM to either take them out or integrate their tech? Microsoft's CEO Steve Ballmer was recently asked this by Maria Bartiromo:
Q: What has stopped you from making really bold bets on engineering science? You've got more than $forty billion on the balance sail. If y'all want to have substantial market place share in smartphones, why not simply acquire Research In Motion, maker of the BlackBerry?
A: Nosotros've made bold technology bets. Nosotros've bet on the Cloud and our Enterprise business; it'southward going fantastic. We fabricated the bet on Xbox; we made the bet on Kinect. We bet on Bing and are growing like a weed in that concern. So I feel pretty proficient most the bets. When do acquisitions brand sense? That's a complicated subject.
Not exactly a specific but when tied into the rest of the interview information technology begins to make sense: Ballmer really believes in Windows Phone 7 noting
There's a lot of competition, but we've got the best-looking phones on the marketplace. We've got the greatest range of alternatives, the phones, the software, the adroitness. It is equally good or meliorate than annihilation out there. We have a lot of work to do. Only, we're in the game. We sold 1.5 million into the carriers.
Why larn RIM when you have a solid product yous believe in? That Dell believes in? RIM appears to be slowly relegating themselves to the sidelines for consumers, and so no demand to help that, evidently. Going further, the money required to take over RIM, integrate their tech and IP, etc. could have years. Going further still, Microsoft sometimes has a spotty tape with acquisitions (run across Danger and 'Project Pink'), ahem. Still, nosotros would have loved to accept over our sister site, Crackberry.
Source: U.s.a. Today; via TechRadar
History catches upwardly
The problem for a consumer HoloLens was ever the lack of Windows Phone
What is the future for Microsoft (and Windows) mixed reality? The latest study from Business Insider sheds some calorie-free, but this all comes back to one major problem for Microsoft: No mobile Windows OS. But what about a future headset that is deject-based? Some thoughts on what could happen for Microsoft mixed reality.
What a mesh
Connect your abode to the all-time mesh Wi-Fi router system
For home networking, mesh Wi-Fi systems provide more reliable coverage than a single router. Cheque out our choice of the best mesh Wi-Fi router systems to ensure y'all never deal with signal dead spots once again.
Source: https://www.windowscentral.com/ballmer-answers-why-no-rim-acquisition
Posted by: stanleythistried.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Ballmer answers why no RIM acquisition?"
Post a Comment